Category Archives: politics

Sniper Michael Gove MP (Once a week news pic)

Image produced by Shawn Sobers for Once a Week News Pic series.
Original copyright remains on image details.

Tougher targets for schools is not the answer to problems in education. The problem is too much top down agenda setting and interfering.  New Labour were bad enough with this, and in a record short space of time the ConDems have exceeded even Blair.  At least New Labour’s endless initiatives had an air of raising aspirations of children and staff.  The ConDems are just living up to their name, and depressing everybody if they don’t meet reactively set arbitrary targets.  Beating up teachers will only make them more demoralised and stressed, which is not good for our children.  You’re getting it seriously wrong Gove.  Painful to witness.

Responding to these stories;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/jun/14/schools-told-raise-bar-gcse-results
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-13788724

 

Obama visits the UK – (Once a Week News series)

Obama photo by Pete Souza – copyright remains
All images, copyright remains with original producers.

Signs of Times – placards of student protest (The Musical)

Photographs taken during the first student & lecturer march against the ConDem rise in tuition fees, November 10th 2010.  A one stop shop for all your student placard slogan needs.

All photography by me – Shawn Sobers
Music by Musical Youth – original copyright remains
All messages by The People

If the video does not show up properly see it on YouTube here – youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTg9UnQrNrU

Islington people attacked by the police. Activist Suzanne Jeffery & councillors speak out.

Message from my activist colleague Corine Dhondee about the heavy-handed tactics she witnessed by the police when secretly filming protests at the council building.  We might look at what is happening in Libya today and say we are lucky and have nothing to complain about, but I feel we must protect the freedoms that we have today, as if we take them for granted and let our freedoms erode and don’t defend them, then tomorrow if they are all gone, it will be too late to complain.

————

Message from   Corine: 

Hi all can you share this pleases? Some of my friends were attacked. I filmed this and edited it.  I think it’s the first time I’ve seen councillors speak out about police brutality and people’s right to protest. I know some students don’t think they have the legal right to protest. The media have done a good job. So if we can get this out that would be great. I didn’t have permission to film so can’t get it out to the ordinary platforms. Thanks Corine.

Sham politics – as councillors vote on £50 million cuts the people of Islington are attacked by police. Activist and councillors speak out about the police and council’s response. Please watch and share. 4 mins.

The media hype and crushing reality of UK politics

 

The national anthem of this election is undoubtedly Public Enemy’s ‘Don’t believe the Hype!’  The Lib Dems weren’t as popular as all the media hype suggested throughout the campaign  after the first Leaders’ debate.   On April 18th The  Times ran the headline ”Nick Clegg nearly as popular as Winston Churchill“, but today the party came in with just 57 seats, 5 less than in 2005.  Even though the hype was undoubtedly quite an accurate reflection of the public’s mood at the time, the election results have shown that hype is only an illusion until reality catches up with it. 

In this election, media hype was exposed like the wizard in the Wizard of Oz,  a lot of noise and flashing lights, but no substance or basis in authenticity.  The British public lost their nerve and voted for the status quo, slapping media hype in the face like the superficial parasite it is, (even if the hype felt good for them at the time).

Don’t Believe the Hype!

I’m proud of the British people however for ignoring the hype and not voting BNP.  They didn’t manage to get a single candidate into parliament.  Even in Barking, which is Nick Griffin’s seat, they came third after Labour and the Tory’s.  They also has lost all 12 of its seats on east London’s Barking and Dagenham Council.  On Radio 4 last night Nick Griffin claimed that Labour had “orchestrated immigration patterns over the years so that Barking became an African area to keep the BNP out“. Immigration as conspiracy theory, Griffin’s inane babble will undoubtedly continue and escalate on towards the next election, whenever and wherever in the country that may.  Griffin personifies inauthentic hype, because basically he is full of crap and analyses the historical and present world as thin as a veneer.  All noise and no sound.

Don’t believe the Hype!  Enjoy, but don’t lose your nerve!

.

UK Election Campaign 2010: The Movie (secret casting notes)

Exactly one week until the good people of England, Scotland and Wales go to the polls, our film got a sudden boost  of publicity yesterday when – stranger than fiction – the current British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called a woman pensioner who confronted him “a bigot”.  * 

Here is how the plans for the film’s main characters, due to be released next Thursday May 6th (UK election day), are shaping up. 

Character synopsis 

Jim Carrey plays Gordon Brown 

 

 

Both lovable friend and a clumsy buffoon, Carrey’s portrayal of Brown pulls at the heart-strings of the populace (audience) – they kind of like him, but do think it would drive them crazy spending more than five minutes longer in his company? 

Zachary Quinto plays David Cameron 

 
As he is known more popularly as psycho Sylar in Heroes, the audience will be forever thinking, even though he’s cool and I kind of like him, is he deathly dangerous underneath and soon show his true self? (Obviously this casting decision, of using a psycho from Heroes, is a metaphor of Cameron being in the Conservative Party) 

Leonardo Dicaprio plays Nick Clegg 

 

 The new cool kid on the block, but no matter how grown up Clegg (Dicaprio) gets, he still looks like a 12-year-old boy and slightly unbelievable.  He talks more sense than Brown and Cameron, but the audience are left with the dilemma, “will the UK be more trusted in the hands of a 12-year-old boy, rather than with an annoying clown or a secret psycho?”   (Judging by the mood & feedback at the test screening of this movie to the general public yesterday, the answer is “probably!”) 

Ends. 

 *If you’re reading outside the UK and don’t know of the when our Prime Minister called a woman a bigot on Live television, this is not a joke!  See here for the BBC news report on the event.

Brown, Cameron, Clegg, and the art of Participation in political rhetoric

This week in the UK we’ve had our first ever televised political leaders debate in an election campaign.  50 years after the USA first did it with Kennedy vs Nixon, there’s no turning back now……..  

I am interested in participation, access, inclusion and those kinds of things, so below is my transcript of the Brown vs Cameron vs Clegg debate, but only including those moments when they were  reaching out to the general public, referencing people they had met on the campaign trails, name-checking the questioners from the audience, reflexively referencing themselves, and also when they were trying to be inclusive with one another.  I’ve cut out the bits where they actually talk about policy, as you can find those details in every other analysis about this event.   

The way the three of them presented their participatory credentials was quite amusing really, and just goes to show that when there is an election looming, all of a sudden politicians remember that we are out there, the Great General Public.  Now is the time to give their Achilles heal a tweak and make them listen to you.  They will take notes, and you might even find yourself name-checked on the next live debate next Thursday.  I’ll see you there!  (I might even read them a quote from Paulo Freire’s ‘Pedagogy of the Oppressed’!).   

The Players…….   

GB = Gordon Brown (Labour)   

DC = David Cameron (Conservative)   

NC = Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrats)   

 Let the show commence…..   

   

     

IMMIGRATION (theme introduced by Gerrard)   

   

GB – “I’ve been listening to people….”
GB – “I talked to a chef the other day who was training…..”
GB – “I then talked to some care assistants….”
GB – “I’ve been visiting a lot of employers in this region…”
DC – “I was in Plymouth recently and a 40 year black man made the point that…..”
NC – “I was in a pediatric hospital in Cardiff a few weeks ago….I asked the ward sister…”
DC – “A lot of people would ask though…..”
NC – “I’m like everybody else….”
GB – “I agree with Nick….”   

     

CRIME (theme introduced by Jacqueline)   


DC – “I went to Crosby the other day and I was talked to a woman there who had just been burgled….”
NC – “In my city of Sheffield where I’m an MP……”
GB – “If you are dissatisfied with the way the police are dealing with your case…….we’ll give you the right to ….….”
DC – “I even went to a drug rehab recently in my own constituency and met a young man who told me…..”
NC – “What I’ve seen in my city of Sheffield….”
GB – “When I was young my father  used to run a youth club with my brother for young people………the more people who do voluntary activities the better…..”
NC – “I think that’s what Jacqueline is talking about…..”
NC – “I met a young man in London the other day and his flat had been burgled five times, and one of them, would you believe it Jacqueline……”
GB – “At Reading prison we’ve been working at this young offenders institution..……”
GB – “I’m grateful for David…..”
DC – “I went to a Hull police station the other day…..”
DC – “My mother was magistrate in Newbury, for 30 years she sat on the bench …..”

   
EXPENSES SCANDAL / CREDIBILITY OF POLITICS (theme introduced by Helen)

   

GB – “I was brought up to believe by my parents…..”
GB – “I want to give the right of recall to you the constituents…..If your MP is misbehaving and guilty of corruption you should have the right to recall…….”
GB – “To give people the right to petition parliament so that your issues can be raised in parliament…..”
DC – “Well Helen I’m not surprised you talked about it in your pub…..”
DC – “As Nick says….”
DC – “I know how angry people are in this county…..I know how angry I was…..”
NC – “You deserve the right to sack your MPs when they are corrupt….”
GB – “You see I agree with Nick…….I think Nick also agrees with me about…..”
GB – “Now Nick supports me in..…..”
GB – “The truth is that Nick does support…..”
DC – “Let’s try and find something that we’d all agree on….I think we’d all agree about that……” 

  
EDUCATION (theme introduced by Joel)   

   

GB – (To Joel) “……I hope I can work with you to do so…”
DC – “As someone who’s got two children, one of them who started in a state school…..”
DC – “I want what every parent in this country wants….”
NC – “I think creativity is important, I think that’s the point you’re making Joel…..”
NC – “Friends of mine who are teachers say…..”
DC – “As a parent of children at state schools…….”
DC – “….what family hasn’t had to do that…..”
NC – “Let’s get back to Joel’s question……”
NC – “As you know, as I certainly know, my two sons go to a local excellent state funded school in my area……”
NC – “That one-to-one tuition that I think Joel agrees is necessary…..”   

 
ECONOMIC GROWTH (theme introduced by Robert)
DC – “A 100 of the leading business people in this country, have all said..….”
NC – “Where are you Robert I can hear your voice but I can’t see you…..ah there you are….Robert I think we need to be open with you, straight with you……”
DC – “Let me take on, Robert, this argument directly……”
NC – “……are we going to be open with people, with you…..?”
NC – “….people before politics……”
GB – “Back to the question Robert put……”
DC – “What are 100 of the leading business people in this county saying…….?”
DC – “I think people at home watching this will find it extraordinary……”   

    

RESOURCES FOR THE ARMED FORCES (theme introduced by Nick)

NC – “You’re right Nick…..”
GB – “My pride and admiration for all our armed forces……”
GB – “Every time I’ve got to write to a family where someone had died….”
DC – “Sorry I couldn’t see Nick in the audience, can you put your hand up?……first of all can I thank you for what you do, and I join with Gordon…….I’ve been to Afghanistan in each of the last four years…..”
NC – “I was in a factory in my own city a few weeks ago.…..”
NC – “…..when, as Nick said in his original question……”
DC – “I went each year, and you didn’t have to talk to that many service men and women before they told you……”   


HEALTH (theme introduced by Sindra)
 DC -“First of all can I thank you for your incredible service to the NHS……what it did for my family and for my son I will never forget……I went from hospital to hospital……”
NC – “…..maternity ward in the NHS hospital where my third son was born just over a year ago is threatened with closure……”
NC – “I was in Burnley the other day…..I think Jacqueline was saying, you come from Burnley, as you know Jacqueline, they’ve closed the A&E department……. ”
DC – “…..for exactly the reason the Sindra gives…..”
GB – “I had a lady write to me who said, I would not be alive today if……”
DC – “I have a man in my constituency called Clive Stone, who had kidney cancer and he came to see me with seven others, tragically two of them have died……”
GB – “Where Nick and I agree is……”

  
CARE FOR THE ELDERLY (theme introduced by Alan) 

DC – “Thank you Alan for asking this question…….”
NC – “I think Alan that this is an issue so big that all parties need to come together to……”
GB – “I agree with Nick….”
DC – “The thing that every carer always says to me more than anything else, is ……..”
NC – “Of course I agree with that……”
NC – “….people before politics…..”
GB – “There are 6 million carers in this country, I’ve met many of them and talked to them about their needs…..”
GB – “…..as Nick said…..”
DC – “….I think it’s right to form a consensus [across the parties]……”
DC – “……we tried to do this with my son……..I found it testing enough……”
GB – “…I think it’s right in the next government to form a consensus……”   

    

CLOSING STATEMENTS   

NC – “Thanks for sticking with us for a full 90 minutes…..I know many of you think that……I hope I’ve tried to show you that……whether it’s questions from Alan on care, Jacqueline on crime, Helen on politics, Joel on schooling, Robert on the deficit……..that will give you and your family a better fairer life.”   

GB – “I was particularly struck by the question from Robert about…….”   

DC – “Let me tell you my values……if you work hard…….if you want to raise a family…….if you’re old or you become ill………”   

.   

.   

AND THE WINNER GOES TO……….(find out on May 6th!   I just hope the winner is the British Public!)   

.   

End of Act One.   

Political Party membership – the figures that really matter (silence in the media that needs to awaken!)

Now with the General Election less than a month away in England, all talk is on how many votes the three main parties will get.  The figures I am more interested in, especially long-term, is how many members will each party have?  The only talk of party membership in the media has been about the far-right British National Party (BNP).  There have been stories about their leaked membership list,  the legal challenge to their racist constitution that discriminated again black & Asian people becoming members, and stories of the general rise in people joining their ranks.

What I want to know is, with the BNP membership blatantly on the rise, what are Labour, Conservative, the Lib Dems and other parties doing to raise their membership, especially amongst young people?  I wouldn’t be surprised if the BNP now had the youngest membership out of all of them put together!  I’m 38 years only and never in my lifetime have I seen a recruitment drive by the three main parties to boost their members.  Whilst they are chasing scrabbling around for voters, their membership has been dropping, (apparently between 1997 – 2008 Labour’s membership has dropped from 400,000 to 170,000 – see here for related blog article by Lib Dem Stephen Tall).

Membership of political parties, according to representation in the media, is reserved for grey men in grey suits that attend party conferences, or grey men in grey suits that donate millions of pounds to the party funds.  What about me?  What about a 38-year-old black British male, where do I sign?  No one has asked me, so I’m not signing anywhere.  (Or do they only want me as a member if I can offer them millions of pounds?  If that is the case, I know where I stand.)

It goes without saying the parties need to use the media to raise the profile of what party membership means, why it is important to British democracy, and what the benefits are to the individual (having your voice heard), and to the country (more voices being heard).  Unless it’s no longer actually important to be a member, but if that is the case, then political reform in the UK needs a complete overall! 

If party membership still is important to this country’s political system, then the media charm offensive to raise awareness needs to be a combined cross-party initiative, and not partisan.  If cross-party fighting and bickering is going to get in the way of raising the awareness about the importance of this important issue, then it is no wonder their membership numbers are dropping so rapidly.

I feel this information needs to get out there, discussed, and acted upon.  (It can’t only be me and Stephen Tall that have thought about this, can it??).   If the BNP are the only party to see the need to boost their membership numbers, especially amongst young people, then whoever wins the upcoming election on May 6 could merely be paving the way for the far-right to take power next time around.  Even if that is a far-fetched scenario, the main political parties cannot become complacent.  The grey men in grey suits are dying off.  Who will replace them?

Semiotics joke of the day!

BBC website asked for comments about the cover of Tony Blair’s forthcoming  autobiography (due to be published in September).  Nick Porter commented;

“Image of Tony Blair slightly to the right of centre. No change there then.”

 

Community Media as ‘Third Cinema’

I haven’t written here much lately as I had to put all my writing energy into finishing writing my PhD, which is now done, (the viva in May, wish me luck!!!).  There are a few places I want to take my research further in the future, one of which is to develop the discourse of positioning the films made in community media educational projects as a form of ‘Third Cinema’, the independent political film tradition  1

Mike Wayne describes Third Cinema as “a body of theory and filmmaking practice committed to social and cultural emancipation.  This body of filmmaking is small, indeed tiny in terms of world cinema output.  Yet Third Cinema films are amongst the most exciting and challenging films ever made….It challenges both the way cinema is conventionally made (for example, it has pioneered collective and democratic production methods) and the way it is consumed.” (Wayne, 2001)

I’m sure this description will resonate with those of you who facilitate the making of films with young people and adults in participatory contexts.

I’m interested in how community media is active in the sense that, rather than only documenting and reflecting on a social situation or problem, it also seeks solutions.  Solutions are often sought through either;

1) the promotion of debate when the work is screened (in schools, community centres, on community radio, etc);

2) through the use of allegory in the actual narrative;  

3) by using the work in training situations for community workers, counsellors, teachers, police, etc, to affect change in decision makers’ attitudes towards a situation.  Community media work is often used in mediation sessions with disputing members of a community as a tool for conflict resolution.

A ‘debate active’ community media ties in with my realisation that community media educational activities are primarily a form of action research (though often without the actual research!) rather than ethnographic in intention.  At the start of my PhD I was thinking that community media is very ethnographic as the films and radio programmes shine a light on their communities, engaging in oral history, unearthing hidden stories, etc, and therefore do anthropology in their own back yards.  I now realise however that these activities are more in the vein of action research, in that they work according to a method to affect change.  They instil a pride in their communities and cultural identities, promoting hidden stories to show the communities have ‘value’, ‘depth’, and a seriousness that can inspire younger generations to take pride in their surroundings, and the people who live there, or to raise awareness and educate about a certain social issue or problem.   

The use of the term ‘action research’ is of course problematic as community media facilitators on the whole do not conduct long term research studies about what they do and the effect it might have.  (That is essentially what my PhD was.)  I guess what I am suggesting by using the term, is that community media education is ‘lived’ action research, rather than academic.  The impacts of how participants have used the projects to progress themselves are evident in life, though often not analysed.  This is where Dr Alexandra Juhasz’s positioning of the term ‘Media Praxis’ becomes useful.  It is ‘Media as Action’, not solely ‘Media as Observation’.  Hence the difference between ‘Research as Action’ (action research), and ‘Research as Observation’ (ethnography).

Thus for participatory producers to consciously make a film, radio programme (etc), knowing they want the work to have an active impact on the audiences regarding their sense of self-worth as a community, and also on the behaviour of audience as individuals, is a politicised act.  This politicised community media practice and community media process sees the work residing in the realm of the larger film tradition of ‘Third Cinema’.  This again demonstrates how community media practice embodies a deep sense of history and theory that is ‘lived’, experienced and worked through, rather than consciously drawn upon and overtly realised.  The realisation of its context in history can only strengthen the work and confidence of community media facilitators.  It has long been realised in academia that community media is politicised and operates as an element of the Habermas’ notion of the Public Sphere, (Howley 2005, and Lewis 2006).  I would now like to take those ideas into the discourse of Third Cinema and methodologies such as ‘lived’ action research.

Soon on this blog I will create some ‘screening rooms’ where community media productions can be discussed in context of ideas such as Third Cinema, the Public Sphere and other notions that I feel are useful to actual community media practice (praxis).  I hope you join me.  Pass the popcorn!

———————

Footnote

1 – First Cinema are “dominant, mainstream” movies, and Second Cinema are ”art[house], authorial” independent films.  (Wayne, 2001, page 2)

 

References

Howley, K (2005), Community Media: People, Places and Communication Technologies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pages 19-20

Lewis, P. (2006). Community Media: Giving “a voice to the Voiceless”, in P. Lewis and S. Jones (Eds.) (2006). From the Margins to the Cutting Edge: Community Media and Empowerment. IAMCR, Hampton Press, USA. Pages 32-33

 Wayne, M. (2001) Political Film: The dialectics of Third Cinema, Pluto Press, London, page 5

—————–